Before explaining why they happened, let’s briefly look at some of the horrific — and entirely preventable — US consequences of the mishandling of COVID-19:
— Hundreds of thousands of Americans are needlessly dying,
— Our economy is being undermined, with Trillions of dollars being wasted, and
— We are lurching towards Communism, as dozens of hard fought for liberties and civil rights are being extracted.
But haven’t we been dealing with a disease of unprecedented historical proportions? NO! See this visual comparison of prior pandemics — and be aware that this shows an inflated death toll for COVID-19. (For example, the majority of COVID-19 deaths were preventable!)
The question now is: have we learned our lesson here, or does it have to get even worse before we wake up? The lesson to be learned comes from understanding how this tragedy came about…
The term “Science” is bandied about continuously. The obvious reason why is that when a product or agenda is officially endorsed by “Science,” it’s like getting the Good Housekeeping Seal of Approval.
The problem is that 95%+ of the public (including legislators), have almost
no idea what “Science” actually is. This leaves the stage open to a wide-variety of bad actors to step in and make false Science claims — knowing that very few will be aware of the deceit. Fewer yet will have the knowledge, time and commitment to publicly challenge these inaccurate Science assertions.
As a professional scientist for 50+ years, let me try to clarify some of the confusion. The best definition for Science is: Science is a Process, and the most recognized Science process is the Scientific Method.
Once we’ve grasped that, part two is the understanding that Science exists for one reason: to give us objective, competent assistance in solving our technical problems (e.g., like COVID-19).
Because of this powerful influence, there is a wide range of Science wanna-be’s. However, if we are paying careful attention, we can discard the pretenders when we see that they do NOT follow scientific protocol. Today, the biggest threat to real Science is political science. (Of course, having the word “Science” in the phrase is the first part of the deception.) Political science is actually just politics — but with a fancy name to make it sound more legitimate. Don’t be fooled.
We are being bombarded with numerous “politically correct” products (industrial wind energy) and agendas (climate change), parading about as if they are proven by Science. They are not!
So, it’s no surprise that COVID-19 policies have fallen prey to this anti-science (and anti-American) scourge. The bottom line is that self-serving parties will continue to use a strategy as long as it works. We need to expose the deviations from real Science in ALL of our technical policies — but here our focus is on COVID-19.
Below are some reports that should help you to be able to separate the wheat from the chaff. The first group are my small efforts at trying to educate the public about the charade we’ve found ourselves in. The second collection are some of the better materials I’ve come across from other parties. This isn’t an exhaustive list, but if you absorb what is here, you’ll be very knowledgeable about the unscientificness of COVID-19 policies.
One would think that as the guardians of their profession, that the Medical Establishment (FDA, CDC, WHO, AMA, NIH) would aggressively be defending their field from science pretenders. Unfortunately, regarding COVID-19, the Medical Establishment has become more a part of the problem, rather than a part of the solution. That’s what my first report outlines.
The second report spells out the most egregious failing of the Medical Establishment regarding COVID-19: that they failed to advocate any science-based therapies, when there were several reasonable options — any of which were superior to doing nothing.
Feel free to pass on any suggestions for improvements of any of my documents (additions, deletions or modifications). Please provide the scientific basis for any corrections. Also, to sign up for our popular, free every-two-weeks Media Balance Newsletter (which covers COVID to Climate and Elections to Energy), email physicist John Droz: here.
Report #1: Some Scientific Observations about the Medical Establishment’s Handling of COVID-19 (with 100+ studies)
Report #2: The FDA COVID-19 Drug Approval Process: Remdesivir vs Ivermectin (referencing 100+ studies)
Re COVID-19 Injections —
Misc Re COVID-19 —
Some other worthwhile COVID-19 Reports, Documents and Commentaries:
Re COVID-19 Therapies —
Short Video: Dr. John Campbell: Ivermectin or Molnupiravir
An extensive collection: COVID-19 Preventions and Treatments
Re COVID-19 Injections —
Short Video: Israel’s Alarming Data
Short Video: COVID-19 Vaccine Data From Singapore
Re COVID-19 Injection Mandates —
Misc Re COVID-19 —
Short video: Have You Heard the Buffalo Paradox?
Report: The Masked Ball of Cowardice
Note that nothing in this webpage should be misconstrued as giving medical advice.
We recommend that for all medical issues that citizens consult with a licensed physician.
For all medical decisions patients should become well-educated — including getting information from different perspectives — so that (with their physician) they can then make informed health decisions.
This is essentially what is spelled out in the Nuremberg Code.